Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04681
Original file (BC 2013 04681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04681

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  YES 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His active duty service commitment (ADSC) extension from the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) begin January 10, the month he originally transferred his educational benefits to his family.



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He initially applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB on 5 Jan 10, then immediately deployed for 365 days.  Shortly after 5 Jan 10, an auto email detailing the follow-on requirement to sign a Statement of Understanding (SOU) to incur an ADSC was sent to his permanent duty station email address which was no longer monitored as he had departed his permanent duty station for pre-deployment training.  Not until Oct 13 did he find out his application had been rejected/closed-out after a second auto email to the same permanent duty station email address went unanswered.  He has since completed the transfer of TEB on 15 Oct 13 and signed the ADSC for four years from that date.  However, in the interest of justice his ACSC should be reestablished at the originally intended transfer date of January 10. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s military personnel records he was serving on active duty in the grade of Lieutenant Colonel at the time of the matter under review.  As he had served on active duty since prior to 11 Sep 01, he is eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right would have incurred a four-year ADSC upon the transfer of said benefits.

On 3 Oct 13, the applicant signed the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB incurring an ADSC of four years. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends approving the application.  Due to the applicant’s pre-deployment training and the lack of a Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) banner during the period of application where an alternative email could have been provided, the applicant did not receive the proper notifications to complete the process.  Therefore, the applicant’s TEB application should be effective 5 Jan 10, with an applicable active duty service commitment date of 4 January 2014.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jan 14, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits on 5 January 2010, thereby incurring a four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) date of 4 January 2014.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04681 in Executive Session on 11 Aug 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 15 Oct 13.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 14.

						







3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01383

    Original file (BC 2014 01383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show he was able to complete transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 8 Aug 11, establishing an active duty service commitment (ADSC) of 7 Aug 15. When accessing the DMDC website for TEB, a message from “Your Service Component” appears, which says that the transfer request is not final until the member digitally signs the Air Force Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Statement of Understanding, and if members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05053

    Original file (BC-2011-05053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post 9/11 benefits to their dependents On 18 Feb 11, the applicant acknowledged and electronically signed the Post...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00146

    Original file (BC-2013-00146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIT states that there is no documentation or evidence to support that the applicant initiated action to obtain the 4 year retainability required for the TEB active duty service commitment (ADSC). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00146 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05445

    Original file (BC 2013 05445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, he was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right and was otherwise eligible to transfer said benefits to his dependents, provided he met the prescribed active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years. Had the applicant successfully transferred his benefits on the date requested (3 Apr 10), he would have incurred a four-year ADSC requiring him to serve until at least 2 Apr 14. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298

    Original file (BC 2013 04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11. He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02905

    Original file (BC-2012-02905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that based onthe information reported in the TEB and counseling notes inRight Now Technology (RNT) by the Total Force Service Center(TFSC) personnel, the applicant was provided all instructions/requirements needed prior to the TEB applicationapproval; specifically, the requirement to sign a Statement ofUnderstanding (SOU) agreeing to the obligated service incurredfor participating in the TEB option under the Post-9/11 GI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04461

    Original file (BC-2011-04461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes his record is in error and unjust because he signed for the GI Bill transfer benefit based on erroneous information that he was provided at the time. Although the applicant states that he was provided erroneous, inaccurate, and misleading information regarding rescinding GI Bill benefits on the Transferability of Educational Benefits (TEB), DPSIT states that this is not a true statement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...